<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Aren&#8217;t Predatory Loans Illegal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourbroker.com/toxic-loans/why-arent-predatory-loans-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourbroker.com/toxic-loans/why-arent-predatory-loans-illegal/</link>
	<description>Consumer Real Estate Information Since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrsizer</title>
		<link>http://www.ourbroker.com/toxic-loans/why-arent-predatory-loans-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourbroker.com/?p=2246#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>Three answers:
1) There is no lobby for the victims
2) There are disclosure rules, which should, and often do, reveal the &quot;predatory&quot; nature of the loan to said victims.
3) Stupid is not a crime - if you don&#039;t read the fine print and don&#039;t shop around, you get what you deserve - caveat emptor (If there were no disclosure rules, I would not make this argument.)

The alternative is to repeal the disclosure laws and make predatory lending a crime.

That is: There is no reason to put a clause in a loan that says &quot;We will not cut off your body parts in case of delinquency&quot;. It is already illegal to do that, so there is no point in &quot;disclosing&quot; it. If offering predatory, which really just means &quot;bad stuff that I don&#039;t like&quot;, terms is illegal, there is no point in disclosing the terms because, by definition, they cannot contain predatory stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three answers:<br />
1) There is no lobby for the victims<br />
2) There are disclosure rules, which should, and often do, reveal the &#8220;predatory&#8221; nature of the loan to said victims.<br />
3) Stupid is not a crime &#8211; if you don&#8217;t read the fine print and don&#8217;t shop around, you get what you deserve &#8211; caveat emptor (If there were no disclosure rules, I would not make this argument.)</p>
<p>The alternative is to repeal the disclosure laws and make predatory lending a crime.</p>
<p>That is: There is no reason to put a clause in a loan that says &#8220;We will not cut off your body parts in case of delinquency&#8221;. It is already illegal to do that, so there is no point in &#8220;disclosing&#8221; it. If offering predatory, which really just means &#8220;bad stuff that I don&#8217;t like&#8221;, terms is illegal, there is no point in disclosing the terms because, by definition, they cannot contain predatory stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

